Week 02 Futher ExperimentDescription

il
Exhibition Visit  
Research
Experiment

During the week, I went to ECA and travelled to London College Of Art to view their BA graduation exhibitions. I organised and mused on the works that inspired me(#1). (🔗CLICK HERE to see my record)

In addition to this part of the visiting, I continued to build on last week's summary, exploring the possibilities of the forms and the visual messages I may could convey(#2), aided by deeper references.
And I start to think about the medium possibilities for this project to use(#3).


Last Week Tutor‘s Feedback
-
1. Continue to try to explore the ways in which forms can be used, their functions and meanings; is it possible that forms are not used for answering, but as a tool for asking questions?

Ref:
William S. Burroughs splicing together the contents of different articles to form new utterances (the semantics will become random, but under the randomness new associations can collide)


2. Rethinking the masking approach in Attempt4, how is it masked? What content should be masked? Does masking with symbols, pattern of a different character, have different meanings?

Ref:
michaelinglis.co.uk - settlement



3. Trying to combine COVER with CONNECTION in Attempt 4?
Each linking point can have an answer.
Appearance vs. connotation, linking vs. choosing.

Process Catalogue
Attempt 5 -  Possible form of the “forms”
As I continued to explore the visual form of forms, I began to think about the use of textual content.
In conjunction with my earlier theme of "regular, homogenised social environments" influencing our "choices" (i.e. how we fill out forms), I thought of " programming languages" as a very effective form of contrasting presentation.

While working on the cargo site, from time to time I would want to add interactions that were not possible to set up on the site, which usually required us to modify and input the site's programming language ourselves. In the process, I have learnt a bit about the system and composition of programming languages. 

When modifying a piece of content, we usually use a definition and a premise for the instruction, and different definitions and scopes will make the content have different interactions. 

The choices we make in life lead to random and indeterminate results, and these "choices" are like the "premises" we add to the code.

But the results of a programming language are not random: once you enter a premise instruction, it will produce the corresponding result without error, and nothing else.
The demo of the js language that corresponds to my website interactions.

Visual Form attempt that I made. (I tried masking and grid systems)
Scentence&Content collected from different people’s answer for “How Do You Avoid Void” & “How Do You Make Choice”. (Metioned it below)
 Masked the contents about “how to do” to let audience think by themselves.